|
An article in the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch points out that the United States does not have a retirement
problem. It has several:
-
Social Security and
Medicare are unsustainable in their current form.
-
Traditional
pensions are going away.
-
A vicious bear
market has eroded 401(k) accounts.
-
The number of
unemployed people between ages fifty-five and sixty-four has risen 143% in the
past year, and the number of jobless over sixty-five is up 73%.
-
Medical costs may
gobble it up whatever nest egg is left.
One Reason to Keep Money in
Your 401(k) upon Retirement
Upon retirement, your
financial adviser might recommend rolling your 401(k) into an IRA. If, though,
you ever expect problems with bills that could lead to creditor judgment, you
might be better off leaving your money in your employer’s 401(k). The reason is
the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, which keeps qualified retirement
plans such as 401(k)s safely out of reach of creditors.
Under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and
Consumer Protection Act of 2005, in the event of a bankruptcy, traditional and
Roth IRAs derived from contributions are protected from creditors for amounts of
up to $1 million. But these protections apply only to bankruptcy.
The Rule of $20
Russell Investments has
invented the new "Retirement Rule of $20" as an alternative to traditional
wisdom that retiree’s need 80% of their pre-retirement income to maintain an
equivalent standard of living in post-career. According to the Rule of $20, it
is not a question of how much income replacement is needed but rather how much
you will need to collect from investments, benefits, and pensions to help combat
market volatility and longevity risk.
The Rule provides an
estimate of the amount of investment income you can expect to earn annually over
the rest of your lifetime. Basically,
for
every $1 of annual income you expect to need over your retirement, you will need
$20 saved at the day of your retirement (with inflation indexing).
The $20 Rule is
based on current data regarding average life expectancies and the long-term rate
of return from a balanced retirement portfolio consisting of 35% equities and
65% bonds.
Older workers are much
less confident about their retirement security than they were two years ago on
account of the current financial crisis, according to a new survey by Watson Wyatt, a
leading global consulting firm. The survey also found that workers with defined
benefit (DB) plans are much more confident in their retirement prospects than
those who participate only in a defined contribution (DC) plan
In its survey, Watson
Wyatt found the percent of workers aged 50-64 who are very confident about
having enough resources to live comfortably five years into retirement dropped
to 44% from 63% in 2007. The numbers for expecting a comfortable lifestyle
fifteen years into retirement are even bleaker. Only 18% think they have
sufficient resources to be comfortable for this long, compared with 34% who felt
that way in 2007. The survey includes responses from more than 2,200 full-time
workers.
Only 20% of U.S.
businesses with fewer than twenty-five employees have retirement plans. Yet, 85% of them feel having a
retirement plan is “really important” according to a survey by ING Direct.
A recent U.S. Supreme
Court case demonstrates the importance of ensuring that beneficiary designations
are current on 401(k) accounts and other company-sponsored retirement plans.
In the case of
Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings and Investment Plan, a couple
had divorced in 1994. The man, who participated in a 401(k) plan, died in 2001.
He had never changed his beneficiary designation in the plan documents after the
divorce, so the court affirmed his ex-wife’s rights to his retirement plan
benefits—though she had waived all claims to the benefits in the divorce decree.
The entire 401(k) account balance went to his ex-wife. His daughter, who had
petitioned for the benefits, saying her father wanted her to have the money, did
not receive a cent. |
The following
summarizes nine retirement planning tools available on the market:
- Brentmark Retirement Plan Analyzer evaluates strategies of taking
distributions from traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs, Roth 401(k)s, and other
qualified retirement plans. Its "quick calculators" tab allows a side-by-side
comparison of conversion of the retirement plan to a Roth IRA. There is also a
new "quick start" menu for faster access to client set-up and functions.
- Also from Brentmark is a Retirement Income Navigator. It uses an asset
allocation approach for optimizing retirement income during the income drawdown
period of retirement.
- The Retirement Plan Analyzer remains Brentmark’s most popular tool among
accountants for its simple but effective blend of economy, flexibility and tax
considerations.
- Brentmark Kugler Estate Analyzer is designed to give estate planners
flexibility in creating advanced financial positions for their clients through
18 inter-related estate-planning techniques.
-
BNA Wealth Manager is a wealth management solution designed especially
for accountants. Aimed at the mid-to-upper end of the planning market, from mass
affluent to ultra-high-net-worth clients, it simplifies complex planning
processes and equips the practitioner to deliver actionable advice to clients.
- The J&L Retirement Planner is a specialized version of the company's
financial planning system, expanded to include reverse mortgages, asset
allocation withdrawals, minimum distributions and scenario event groups.
- Money Minders Financial Planning Spreadsheets operates on the Microsoft
Excel platform with a variety of twenty-five templates for retirement that will
strongly appeal to accountants who craft their own plans and presentations but
want stronger calculation and scenario comparison capabilities.
2009: A Re-Do Year
The Economic Growth and
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (EGTRRA) of 2001will command the attention this
year of everyone who works with retirement plans. The reason is that the law
makes 2009 a "re-do" year for most retirement plans.
In June 2001, EGTRRA
introduced significant enhancements to retirement plans to permit employees to
save more in employer plans and IRAs, ease portability among various plans and
provide significant administrative and fiduciary relief to employers who sponsor
retirement plans.
EGTRRA also included
measures like the saver's credit, which benefits low-income savers, and catch-up
contributions that permit older workers to save more under the plans.
All retirement plans
were required to comply with EGTRRA and adopt interim EGTRRA amendments.
Employers must now
amend and restate their written plan documents to conform to the way the plan
has been operated, by incorporating the changes made by EGTRRA.
Top
Retirement Center Offerings
Corporate Insight, a
leader in competitive intelligence in the financial service industry, has
announced the release of a new series of research reports that will focus on
retirement-related offerings in the annuities, credit cards, mutual fund,
banking and brokerage sectors. The series launches with an initial,
first-of-its-kind report that examines the top dedicated Retirement Centers
offered by brokerages. Corporate Insight carefully evaluates the breadth and
accessibility of information that fourteen leading brokerages are providing to
customers.
Three firms—E*Trade
Financial, Fidelity, and TD Ameritrade—earned top honors from Corporate Insight
for providing an overall complete retirement center offering while Charles
Schwab stood out for its comprehensive public and private site offerings. Its
public site allows prospective clients to use planning tools and educational
resources with the option to enroll in the firm’s services prominently
available.
Military Retirement
Pay after Divorce
Under current Oklahoma law,
when a couple divorce, the non-military spouse gets a percentage of military
retirement pay when the service member retires. A new law will take effect in
July to require judges to consider the length of the marriage and the military
person's rank at the time of the marriage when dividing the military retirement
pay. Another provision that takes effect July 1 requires an ex-spouse to file a
legal document within two years of the divorce stating they intend to pursue
legal proceedings to get a portion of a spouse's military retirement pay. The
proposed changes in Oklahoma law mirror a national movement to address issues of
veteran pay.
|
|